"[Lt. Governor Mark Parkinson] came out and said regardless of what we do we don't have any grounds to doUh, we're no political science majors or anything (oh wait, yes we are!), but this seems more to us like a case where the separation of powers has been markedly successful.
what we're going to do," Merrick said. "It's us saying there is a separation of
power issue, and we're going to take care of our interest and protect our
members because we are an equal body."
Merrick and Neufeld had a chance to override the Governor's veto (her check on the powers of the legislative branch) and failed. The fact that Neufeld and Merrick couldn't muster the votes to override the veto just means they were on the wrong side of the issue. The mere opportunity to do so is the separation of powers in action.
Nowhere in the Constitution, state or federal, does it say that the outcome of such maneuvering has to be to the liking of the majority.
The Wichita Eagle's Phillip Brownlee hit the nail on the head in his blog today.
What are they suing her for again? My head hurts.
The Kansas Supreme Court will decide whether Bremby followed the rule of law. It would be a waste of taxpayer money for the Legislature to go to court over the same issues.